Author Topic: Avengers two called Age of Ultron (Read 1838 times)

Silva-silva · « **on:** July 21, 2013, 12:49:39 AM »

http://ca.ign.com/articles/2013/07/21/comic-con-avengers-2-title-is-avengers-age-of-ultron

I don't think it has anything to do with the comic, I just think they just liked the name.

CosmicToxin · « **Reply #1 on:** July 21, 2013, 08:35:36 AM »

Your right it doesn't, its just a name. I want to know how scarlet witch and quicksilver will fit in as villains in an age of ultron film. Maybe like n the show, he is an AI, and he gathers villains to battle the avengers?

HyperVoiceActing · « **Reply #2 on:** July 21, 2013, 11:34:00 AM »

Wait, when was it said that Pietro and Wanda are gonna be villians?

Spidermew · « **Reply #3 on:** July 21, 2013, 11:41:31 AM »

Vin here pretty much gives away the fact he's playing Vision by mentioning the multiple versions of the character. (When he mentions Ultron and Proctor both creating a version of the character that he's going to play.)

HyperVoiceActing · « **Reply #4 on:** July 21, 2013, 04:02:19 PM »

Meeeh ... I don't quite like the idea of Vin playing Vision

Though he DOES seem to have the lack of emotion in his acting down

warecus · « **Reply #5 on:** July 21, 2013, 05:45:20 PM »

Keanu reeves would be a good vision then

edugal · « **Reply #6 on:** August 02, 2013, 12:51:03 AM »

What??!!!! If you watch the end of Avengers, there is a scene with Thanos. Why aren't they using him?

PR_1030 · « **Reply #7 on:** August 02, 2013, 06:00:52 AM »

I guess he's probably saving him for a 3rd movie.

CosmicToxin · « **Reply #8 on:** August 02, 2013, 08:24:47 AM »

I guess they are trying to build up the avengers roster so that thanos would have more people to fight because he is after all a major threat ti the universe

edugal · « **Reply #9 on:** August 02, 2013, 11:15:28 AM »

I guess so. Well, then I just hope they add Spidey in this one since he got a movie. I hate people who get all their information on heroes from movies and then bash my favorite hero by saying "Spider-Man isn't in Avengers.

."

Yun0 · « **Reply #10 on:** August 02, 2013, 06:53:26 PM »

Quote from: edugal on August 02, 2013, 11:15:28 AM

I guess so. Well, then I just hope they add Spidey in this one since he got a movie. I hate people who get all their information on heroes from movies and then bash my favorite hero by saying "Spider-Man isn't in Avengers. ."

well... Spiderman isn't in the Marvel Cinematic Universe

PR_1030 · « **Reply #11 on:** August 03, 2013, 06:32:12 AM »

Spider-man is by Columbia Pictures (I think) and Avengers is by Disney (I think) so sorry to pop you're bubble but I doubt that they'll be connected. If they were, then where was Spidey when New York was attacked? Maybe Avengers was before The Amazing Spider-Man?

edugal · « **Reply #12 on:** August 03, 2013, 03:01:29 PM »

The first Avengers movie was released before The Amazing Spider-Man which is by Columbia/Sony, and that is a good point about the different studios. I really thought Disney should have gotten the rights to Spidey after Spider-Man 4 got cancelled (because the old ones were by Columbia as well). And while we're on that topic, the X-Men movies were all made by Fox, except for maybe The Wolverine, which I haven't seen yet, so Wolvie might not make it either.

Excahm · « **Reply #13 on:** August 03, 2013, 06:17:20 PM »

wow wow wow....
Sorry for the noob question but
isnt Ultron that robot that can beat down any of the Advengers almost easy?
Just saw him on that Advengers show on Disney Channel (which i liked) and is awesome and powefull far see.

Kriven · « **Reply #14 on:** August 04, 2013, 02:38:22 PM »

Quote from: edugal on August 03, 2013, 03:01:29 PM

The first Avengers movie was released before The Amazing Spider-Man which is by Columbia/Sony, and that is a good point about the different studios. I really thought Disney should have gotten the rights to Spidey after Spider-Man 4 got cancelled (because the old ones were by Columbia as well). And while we're on that topic, the X-Men movies were all made by Fox, except for maybe The Wolverine, which I haven't seen yet, so Wolvie might not make it either.

The film rights to Spider-Man, X-Men, and the Fantastic Four are currently licensed out to other studios, inluding a large portion of the supporting characters for those franchises. So no, Spider-Man and Wolverine will not be appearing in the next Avengers film, and neither will Human Torch or Thing.

None of those movies take place within the same canon as the Marvel Studios pictures, and have no placement on that timeline.

The Wolverine movies were produced and distributed by Fox. I suspect that when the rights finally revert, we'll be getting a new actor to portray Logan.

Arkady · « **Reply #15 on:** August 04, 2013, 03:16:05 PM »

I doubt that the movie producers want to have Spiderman and wolverine in the avengers, there are heaps of avengers already to choose from, still antman, wasp, black panther, scarlet witch, quicksilver, vision, miss marvel, even she hulk, still to be added to the team before any "new" avengers make the movie scene, in this avengers movie universe, and to boot those two characters have there own movies, that stem away from the what avengers villians and storylines would cater for, i would hope they would eventually make a movie with them in it, but not till the 5th movie or so, it wouldn't really be fair to the comics that spanned for 40+years before wolverine and spidey joined the team, but that's just my opinion

Yun0 · « **Reply #16 on:** August 08, 2013, 04:31:52 PM »

ok, once again: Spidy, the X-men and any Fantastic Four WON't be in any Marvel cinematic Unevierse movie. They Just Can't.
Only if the movies owned by the studios (X-men/F4: Fow & Spidy: Sony) won't work (a l'a Ghost Rider: Spirit of Vengeanze that was just crap, and Sony didn't want to do another sequel, so they know that the GR series wasn't working and then they reverted the rights to Marvel).
Spidy was the first char that could have been reverted to Marvel, cuz they canceled Spidy 4, so the were advice that if they didn't make a movie within a year then, they needed to revert the rights to MArvel, and Spidy is not a movie franchise that anyone would like to lo$e. That's why we can't see also the X-men in a Marvel film, even Origins that was a crappy movie, left Fox with a looot of money, and that's the same case why we are going to see an X-Factor movie in 2 years from now... Maybe if the Fantastic Fou movie sucks, we'll see another reboot (gosh, not again) but in the Marvel/Disney universe.
This is all about money

KPT25 · « **Reply #17 on:** August 29, 2013, 02:19:20 PM »

Marvel has just announced that Ultron will be played by James Spader

http://marvel.com/news/story/21099/exclusive_avengers_age_of_ultron_casts_james_spader_as_the_films_legendary_villain

Discuss how he might be a better option than Affleck as Batman or not...

.Batzarro. · « **Reply #18 on:** August 29, 2013, 02:47:55 PM »

Isn't this just a voiced by type thing and not necessarily being the character.? I would assume Ultron would be mostly cgi so I see no problem with this.

HyperVoiceActing · « **Reply #19 on:** August 29, 2013, 05:47:40 PM »

Well Ultron IS a human shaped android. Maybe there will be some mo-cap involved

C.R.O.M. - 有且只有一個 · « **Reply #20 on:** August 29, 2013, 08:48:30 PM »

Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch were confirmed for the next one.

HyperVoiceActing · « **Reply #21 on:** August 29, 2013, 10:54:26 PM »

Yep, they're even have an actress in negotiations to play her

News:

Author Topic: Avengers two called Age of Ultron (Read 1838 times)

IMT Facebook

Help us by Donating!

IMT Discord

Join us at our Discord! Click the image below!

IMT Shoutbox

Recent Posts

IMT Calendar