Infinity MUGEN Team

IMT Discussions => Video Games => Topic started by: Vault-tec Rep Høröúßøí on March 05, 2014, 11:15:14 AM

Title: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Vault-tec Rep Høröúßøí on March 05, 2014, 11:15:14 AM
Official Batman: Arkham Knight Announce Trailer - "Father to Son" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wsf78BS9VE0#ws)

all i can say is already said in this smiley........
@-)

But wait........

(http://ist2-2.filesor.com/pimpandhost.com/2/2/8/8/22884/2/1/9/L/219L2/BAK_bonusLG.jpg)

gamestop says its coming out on 10/14/2014.... so now i'm kinda pissed they released the trailer and stuff 7 months ahead of release, lol
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: HyperVoiceActing on March 05, 2014, 12:01:19 PM
What are the odds that they'll give us the classic Harley outfit as an alternate skin for Miss Quinzell?

Hey they gave Catwoman and Deathstroke their own skins
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Twinimage on March 10, 2014, 02:01:09 PM
Glad that Rocksteady is back. Glad they are finishing it up as sort of a trilogy, if you don't count Arkham Origins.
Very cool trailer. Love the bat mobile design and hope in the game you can exit the bat cave that way. That would be sweet. I really like the sound of them including the bat mobile. And no multiplayer this time. Good for them for sticking to their guns and maintaining high quality.

Only for PS4 and XBONE!?!? Darn. I have recently been thinking of getting a Wii U. Hopefully they will decide to include Wii U as a platform for this game. :(

I know Harley is popular right now, but it seems odd to make her playable of all characters. Not sure how the gameplay could work. Why not Damian or Red Hood?
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: HyperVoiceActing on March 10, 2014, 08:31:56 PM
Maybe cause no one likes Jason or Damian  :D
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Macaulyn97 on March 10, 2014, 08:51:39 PM
It doesn't, if the character is popular, then is worth being playable. Honestly, since Joker, Bane, Deathstroke were playable, I see no reason for denying this to Harley, specially as the first female of the Arkham series.
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Vault-tec Rep Høröúßøí on December 24, 2014, 03:05:55 PM
Maybe cause no one likes Jason or Damian  :D

http://immagini.z-giochi.com/2014/07/batman-arkham-knight-red-hood-story.jpg (http://immagini.z-giochi.com/2014/07/batman-arkham-knight-red-hood-story.jpg)

actually, todd is now part of the awesome!
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: warecus on December 24, 2014, 05:08:18 PM
i really like his outfit
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Vault-tec Rep Høröúßøí on December 25, 2014, 01:26:50 PM
i really like his outfit

i know right?!

heres a better view
(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: warecus on December 25, 2014, 03:06:10 PM
cool, I wonder if his gameplay will be shooting up fools
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Twinimage on December 26, 2014, 12:23:00 AM
Ha ha! I called it! Red Hood will be payable. :D
If Deathstroke didn't slaughter people in Origins, Red Hood probably won't be shooting up baddies. But who knows how he will play. As long as he doesn't feel like Batman with an alternate skin/costume.
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Harbinger on February 25, 2015, 09:44:04 AM
New Arkham Knight video!!!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nh3zBn6hdkg (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nh3zBn6hdkg#ws)
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: HyperVoiceActing on February 25, 2015, 12:03:13 PM
Also everyone's cheering that the game's now rated M  8=|
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Macaulyn97 on February 25, 2015, 09:03:54 PM
When will they release a gameplay video of Harley? Anyway, it looks like Poison Ivy may change sides (for a while, at least).
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: DEMONKAI on February 26, 2015, 12:20:50 AM
damn this sh*t looks HOT...glad you can use his bat mobile now..
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: HyperVoiceActing on April 17, 2015, 07:21:15 PM
Not sure if this is known yet but...

http://www.playstation.com/en-us/explore/ps4/systems/batman-arkham-knight-ps4-bundle/ (http://www.playstation.com/en-us/explore/ps4/systems/batman-arkham-knight-ps4-bundle/)

And thus, Origins has lost the only edge it had  :D
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Twinimage on April 17, 2015, 11:16:44 PM
Also everyone's cheering that the game's now rated M  8=|

Ya, that automatically means it's going to be better... Not like the other Arkham games weren't good or anything. Those were rated T... for babies. :P
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Tha Lando ( Le CROM ) on April 18, 2015, 11:24:04 AM
I want this game!!! Looks tight and even better than the previous ones which were great also.  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Uche_of_IMT on April 28, 2015, 07:34:01 AM
Official Batman: Arkham Knight Trailer - "All Who Follow You" (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CINA288fZUs#ws)
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: DEMONKAI on April 28, 2015, 09:32:11 PM
That trailer was f*ckin fire....I must pre order that sh*t for sure
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Laforga on April 29, 2015, 04:22:00 PM
I hear the pre-order with all the perks is quite pricey...
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Laforga on April 29, 2015, 04:49:41 PM
Actually, the fuss is about the season pass. Apparently in it´s content, it is quite the leap of faith!
Sorry for the "manuscript" but this guy raises some interesting points


Batman: Arkham Knight / 29 Apr 2015
Opinion: Batman: Arkham Knight’s Season Pass is Absurd
180
A high price for a poorly defined trickle of content makes no sense.

By Dan Stapleton

"I don’t believe that the existence of DLC content will necessarily diminish the quality of the $60 version of Batman: Arkham Knight. After WB’s recent announcement of a season pass, it remains one of my most hotly anticipated games of 2015, and I intend to play the hell out of it. That said: what the hell is this?

For $40, Warner Bros and Rocksteady promise us the following:

“This season pass for Batman: Arkham Knight delivers new content every month for 6 months, featuring new story missions, more supervillains invading Gotham City, new legendary Batmobiles, advanced challenge maps, alternative character skins, and new drivable race tracks.”

As a huge Batman fan, that strikes me as completely bonkers. Even if some of this extra content ends up being great – I do love Arkham challenge maps, and I might even spring for a well-done Animated Series Batman skin (yes, again) – there’s virtually no way all of it will be worth paying for. Who in their right mind would buy a bundle of vaguely described DLC all at once, especially sight unseen, at two-thirds the price of a full new game?
There’s so much we don’t know about this. We don’t know what the significance of a supervillain “invading Gotham” is. We don’t know what the skins are. We don’t know what these “legendary Batmobiles” will look like, or if they’ll behave differently from the stock version. And it’s especially weird that we’re promised Batmobile race tracks before that completely new feature has been shown off in any meaningful way. I definitely hope it will be fun, and I’m optimistic that Rocksteady wouldn’t have added driving at all if there weren’t a good idea behind it beyond a simple arcade racer... but that doesn’t make it something I’m willing to spend money for more of right now. The point of DLC is to give me the chance to buy more of the stuff I like, and I don’t know if I’ll like this yet.

Let’s also consider that historically, Batman games’ DLC hasn’t inspired a lot of confidence. Both Arkham City and Arkham Origins eventually produced roughly $40 in DLC: there’s one short, story-based add-on for each game for $10 apiece (which I found somewhat half-hearted), a handful of challenge maps that include the ability to play as Batman’s sidekicks, and skin packs. (Arkham Origins also has two $2.99 “Supply Drop” packs that promise “a measurable advantage in online gameplay,” which would be super gross if anyone played Arkham Origins’ multiplayer.) Absolutely none of that is essential – aside from the novelty of playing as a different character, you wouldn’t miss much at all by skipping it completely.

Beyond that, there’s a big pacing problem. We’re talking about a slow trickle of content coming out over the course of six months, for an exclusively single-player game. Now, I absolutely loved Arkham Asylum and Arkham City, and to a lesser extent I enjoyed Arkham Origins, but I didn’t play them for more than a couple of weeks before I’d had my fill and moved on while I was still feeling high on Bat life. The prospect of coming back to a city I’ve already spent a few dozen hours punching my way through every month just to play through a couple of new story missions or try on a new skin sounds dull and obligatory.

How about this: I just wait six months for all the DLC to come out, snap up the pieces that look interesting when most of them are on sale (for certainly less than $40,) and then play through all of it at once to make my return to Gotham a worthwhile stay rather than a sad, “Well, I guess I already paid for this junk” drive-by?

It’s times like this that we’re reminded that the concept of a season pass was conceived not as a way to deliver value (as any quality DLC should sell itself by looking cool), but as an incentive to hold onto your copy when you’re done playing instead of selling it back to GameStop or passing it on to a friend. This high-priced and poorly defined pass feels like an especially cynical implementation of that concept. I’ll be playing Arkham Knight, but I won’t be buying the season pass – and I don’t recommend that you do, either."
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Vault-tec Rep Høröúßøí on May 03, 2015, 02:19:47 PM
http://batman-news.com/2015/05/02/new-batman-arkham-knight-dlc-details-play-as-batgirl-photo/ (http://batman-news.com/2015/05/02/new-batman-arkham-knight-dlc-details-play-as-batgirl-photo/)

(http://ist3-1.filesor.com/pimpandhost.com/2/2/8/8/22884/2/V/b/h/2Vbhi/BAKBatgirl.jpg)

and heres my truck full of money
(http://ist3-2.filesor.com/pimpandhost.com/2/2/8/8/22884/2/U/t/M/2UtM0/truck_load_of_money.png)
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: HyperVoiceActing on May 03, 2015, 02:49:33 PM
Something about it seems photoshopped to me. Mainly the helmet.

Also, is that suppose to be Cassandra Cain or Stephine Brown?
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Rage on May 03, 2015, 04:22:05 PM
this is just shameful....they just need to up the prices of games and stop with all this false dlc and incomplete games releasing mess. give up full games, true dlc, and hell unlockables too.
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Tha Lando ( Le CROM ) on May 03, 2015, 04:45:39 PM
this is just shameful....they just need to up the prices of games and stop with all this false dlc and incomplete games releasing mess. give up full games, true dlc, and hell unlockables too.
^^(PM)^ i second that!
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: -Whiplash- on May 04, 2015, 10:33:23 AM
Something about it seems photoshopped to me. Mainly the helmet.

Also, is that suppose to be Cassandra Cain or Stephine Brown?

Reading the article helps.

Quote
Batgirl: A Matter of Family

An all new prequel story expansion in an entirely new location where you play as Batgirl for the very first time in the Arkham series – check out the first render of Batgirl.

It's Barbara.
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: HyperVoiceActing on May 04, 2015, 12:49:38 PM
It's Barbara.
So was Barb originally a brunette but dyed her hair red when she became Oracle in this universe?
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: -Whiplash- on May 04, 2015, 01:33:32 PM
So was Barb originally a brunette but dyed her hair red when she became Oracle in this universe?

well, alternatively they changed Cassandra's mask or gave Stephanie brown hair.
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: DEMONKAI on May 08, 2015, 09:26:06 PM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKY3scPIMd8#ws (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKY3scPIMd8#ws)
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: HyperVoiceActing on May 09, 2015, 09:10:21 AM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKY3scPIMd8#ws (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UKY3scPIMd8#ws)
What does YouTube tech support have to do with this game?
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: DEMONKAI on May 09, 2015, 05:56:41 PM
 :(|) Wtf lol

nnnah man I didn't do that....I don't know wth hell happened...either it was changed or something happened to the video content :-??...

anyway it was a batman trailer on what character you can use in it to assist you
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Rage on May 09, 2015, 08:02:19 PM
:(|) Wtf lol

nnnah man I didn't do that....I don't know wth hell happened...either it was changed or something happened to the video content :-??...

anyway it was a batman trailer on what character you can use in it to assist you
youtube changes your link....
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: DEMONKAI on May 10, 2015, 12:47:52 AM
that's weird
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Rage on May 10, 2015, 01:20:36 AM
that's weird
well on the bright side it forces people to post the links correctly, so i dont have to change them all the time anymore.  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: sky79 on May 10, 2015, 03:02:00 AM
Till they change the code again  ;*))

Anyway, I noticed that the Batjet will be in play for upgrades to the Batmobile. Likely more powerful weapons and tools.

Anyone else actually hope we get to fly it? It would be a first, that's for sure.
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: DEMONKAI on May 21, 2015, 06:22:11 PM
And I shall have it.....

http://youtu.be/ILSg4BVD9f8 (http://youtu.be/ILSg4BVD9f8)
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: HyperVoiceActing on May 22, 2015, 12:41:19 AM
Lame trailer is lame.

Stick to gameplay or cinematic trailers, Rocksteady
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Laforga on May 22, 2015, 05:56:43 AM
My thoughts exactly, it is lame and hazardous
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: DEMONKAI on May 28, 2015, 08:41:03 PM
Is this a bit better?
http://youtu.be/UyAEFmYoiDg (http://youtu.be/UyAEFmYoiDg)
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Laforga on May 29, 2015, 09:25:39 AM
Actually, yes it is! The only downside is that giant hole in your wallet
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: HyperVoiceActing on May 29, 2015, 03:25:06 PM
About that bit at the end, I'll say it again...

And thus, Origins has lost the only edge it had
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Vault-tec Rep Høröúßøí on May 30, 2015, 05:42:17 AM
About that bit at the end, I'll say it again...

And thus, Origins has lost the only edge it had

wait... origins had a edge?
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: DEMONKAI on May 30, 2015, 05:12:49 PM
well heres a past video I forgot to repost again since the link was bad....

http://youtu.be/QGg2_VVtWoE (http://youtu.be/QGg2_VVtWoE)
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: HyperVoiceActing on May 30, 2015, 10:24:36 PM
wait... origins had a edge?
The Adam West skin
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Vault-tec Rep Høröúßøí on June 02, 2015, 09:01:45 PM
http://youtu.be/UtxlxMW8d6M (http://youtu.be/UtxlxMW8d6M)
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: DEMONKAI on June 03, 2015, 06:52:55 PM
Just in case no one seen this gameplay video yet...(its not posted in this thread already)

http://youtu.be/FpfytI2K7-I (http://youtu.be/FpfytI2K7-I)
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: DEMONKAI on June 23, 2015, 12:43:56 AM
My pre order came a day early....been playing that sh*t since i got home with it around 7 pm lol....bout to catch some ZZs though...gotta get up for work  :(

But that batmobile action is hot fire^^ Cool @ss game so far  :thumbsup:
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Laforga on June 23, 2015, 05:59:32 AM
You lucky bastard, mine only comes in tomorrow probably!
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: DEMONKAI on June 23, 2015, 08:06:15 PM
lol yea I wa up till like 2 AM in the damn morning playing.....I love that Batmobile tank....makes this much more fun...
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Laforga on June 24, 2015, 06:36:27 AM
Yeah, just remember, even Batman as to get some sleep. Enjoy, friend!
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Laforga on June 25, 2015, 10:05:48 AM
 I have also donned the cape crusader  and it´s awesome... Hell, i´ll sleep when I die
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: DEMONKAI on June 25, 2015, 06:24:21 PM
Groovy. welcome to the madness
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Vault-tec Rep Høröúßøí on June 25, 2015, 06:53:45 PM
I have also donned the cape crusader  and it´s awesome... Hell, i´ll sleep when I die

sleep is for the weak, bruce don't sleep, thus why he not weak

edit: I HATE SPOILERS! thx to the game not playing its opera music i couldn't find a body and had to look online and found a video littered in spoilers
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: Jelux Da Casual on July 20, 2015, 03:53:39 PM
Mark Hamill

Mark Hamill

Arkham

I just blew your mind...
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: HyperVoiceActing on July 21, 2015, 09:29:49 AM
Mark Hamill

Mark Hamill

Arkham

I just blew your mind...
Huh, never pieced this together before XD
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: DEMONKAI on July 22, 2015, 09:15:06 PM
Mark Hamill

Mark Hamill

Arkham

I just blew your mind...

lol funny
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: sky79 on July 23, 2015, 07:23:10 PM
Highly displeased with the ending. The reasons are obvious, no spoilers.
Title: Re: Batman: Arkham Knight
Post by: HyperVoiceActing on July 25, 2015, 05:24:57 PM
Good thing I liked about Matter of Family: Harley finally dons her classic outfit  :cool

Oh and more Hamil
SimplePortal 2.3.5 © 2008-2012, SimplePortal