Batman: Arkham Knight

[Vault-tec Rep Høröúßøí]

all i can say is already said in this smiley........


But wait........

gamestop says its coming out on 10/14/2014.... so now i'm kinda pissed they released the trailer and stuff 7 months ahead of release,

[HyperVoiceActing]

What are the odds that they'll give us the classic Harley outfit as an alternate skin for Miss Quinzell?

Hey they gave Catwoman and Deathstroke their own skins

[Twinimage]

Glad that Rocksteady is back. Glad they are finishing it up as sort of a trilogy, if you don't count Arkham Origins.
Very cool trailer. Love the bat mobile design and hope in the game you can exit the bat cave that way. That would be sweet. I really like the sound of them including the bat mobile. And no multiplayer this time. Good for them for sticking to their guns and maintaining high quality.

Only for PS4 and XBONE!?!? Darn. I have recently been thinking of getting a Wii U. Hopefully they will decide to include Wii U as a platform for this game.

I know Harley is popular right now, but it seems odd to make her playable of all characters. Not sure how the gameplay could work. Why not Damian or Red Hood?

[HyperVoiceActing]

Maybe cause no one likes Jason or Damian 

[Macaulyn97]

It doesn't, if the character is popular, then is worth being playable. Honestly, since Joker, Bane, Deathstroke were playable, I see no reason for denying this to Harley, specially as the first female of the Arkham series.

[Vault-tec Rep Høröúßøí]

Maybe cause no one likes Jason or Damian 

http://immagini.z-giochi.com/2014/07/batman-arkham-knight-red-hood-story.jpg

actually, todd is now part of the awesome!

[warecus]

i really like his outfit

[Vault-tec Rep Høröúßøí]

i really like his outfit

i know right?!

heres a better view

(click to show/hide)

[warecus]

cool, I wonder if his gameplay will be shooting up fools

[Twinimage]

Ha ha! I called it! Red Hood will be payable.
If Deathstroke didn't slaughter people in Origins, Red Hood probably won't be shooting up baddies. But who knows how he will play. As long as he doesn't feel like Batman with an alternate skin/costume.

[Harbinger]

New Arkham Knight video!!!

[HyperVoiceActing]

Also everyone's cheering that the game's now rated M 

[Macaulyn97]

When will they release a gameplay video of Harley? Anyway, it looks like Poison Ivy may change sides (for a while, at least).

[DEMONKAI]

damn this sh*t looks HOT...glad you can use his bat mobile now..

[HyperVoiceActing]

Not sure if this is known yet but...

http://www.playstation.com/en-us/explore/ps4/systems/batman-arkham-knight-ps4-bundle/

And thus, Origins has lost the only edge it had 

[Twinimage]

Also everyone's cheering that the game's now rated M 

Ya, that automatically means it's going to be better... Not like the other Arkham games weren't good or anything. Those were rated T... for babies.

[Tha Lando ( Le CROM )]

I want this game!!! Looks tight and even better than the previous ones which were great also. 

[Uche_of_IMT]

[DEMONKAI]

That trailer was f*ckin fire....I must pre order that sh*t for sure

[Laforga]

I hear the pre-order with all the perks is quite pricey...

[Laforga]

Actually, the fuss is about the season pass. Apparently in it´s content, it is quite the leap of faith!
Sorry for the "manuscript" but this guy raises some interesting points


Batman: Arkham Knight / 29 Apr 2015
Opinion: Batman: Arkham Knight’s Season Pass is Absurd
180
A high price for a poorly defined trickle of content makes no sense.

By Dan Stapleton

"I don’t believe that the existence of DLC content will necessarily diminish the quality of the $60 version of Batman: Arkham Knight. After WB’s recent announcement of a season pass, it remains one of my most hotly anticipated games of 2015, and I intend to play the hell out of it. That said: what the hell is this?

For $40, Warner Bros and Rocksteady promise us the following:

“This season pass for Batman: Arkham Knight delivers new content every month for 6 months, featuring new story missions, more supervillains invading Gotham City, new legendary Batmobiles, advanced challenge maps, alternative character skins, and new drivable race tracks.”

As a huge Batman fan, that strikes me as completely bonkers. Even if some of this extra content ends up being great – I do love Arkham challenge maps, and I might even spring for a well-done Animated Series Batman skin (yes, again) – there’s virtually no way all of it will be worth paying for. Who in their right mind would buy a bundle of vaguely described DLC all at once, especially sight unseen, at two-thirds the price of a full new game?
There’s so much we don’t know about this. We don’t know what the significance of a supervillain “invading Gotham” is. We don’t know what the skins are. We don’t know what these “legendary Batmobiles” will look like, or if they’ll behave differently from the stock version. And it’s especially weird that we’re promised Batmobile race tracks before that completely new feature has been shown off in any meaningful way. I definitely hope it will be fun, and I’m optimistic that Rocksteady wouldn’t have added driving at all if there weren’t a good idea behind it beyond a simple arcade racer... but that doesn’t make it something I’m willing to spend money for more of right now. The point of DLC is to give me the chance to buy more of the stuff I like, and I don’t know if I’ll like this yet.

Let’s also consider that historically, Batman games’ DLC hasn’t inspired a lot of confidence. Both Arkham City and Arkham Origins eventually produced roughly $40 in DLC: there’s one short, story-based add-on for each game for $10 apiece (which I found somewhat half-hearted), a handful of challenge maps that include the ability to play as Batman’s sidekicks, and skin packs. (Arkham Origins also has two $2.99 “Supply Drop” packs that promise “a measurable advantage in online gameplay,” which would be super gross if anyone played Arkham Origins’ multiplayer.) Absolutely none of that is essential – aside from the novelty of playing as a different character, you wouldn’t miss much at all by skipping it completely.

Beyond that, there’s a big pacing problem. We’re talking about a slow trickle of content coming out over the course of six months, for an exclusively single-player game. Now, I absolutely loved Arkham Asylum and Arkham City, and to a lesser extent I enjoyed Arkham Origins, but I didn’t play them for more than a couple of weeks before I’d had my fill and moved on while I was still feeling high on Bat life. The prospect of coming back to a city I’ve already spent a few dozen hours punching my way through every month just to play through a couple of new story missions or try on a new skin sounds dull and obligatory.

How about this: I just wait six months for all the DLC to come out, snap up the pieces that look interesting when most of them are on sale (for certainly less than $40,) and then play through all of it at once to make my return to Gotham a worthwhile stay rather than a sad, “Well, I guess I already paid for this junk” drive-by?

It’s times like this that we’re reminded that the concept of a season pass was conceived not as a way to deliver value (as any quality DLC should sell itself by looking cool), but as an incentive to hold onto your copy when you’re done playing instead of selling it back to GameStop or passing it on to a friend. This high-priced and poorly defined pass feels like an especially cynical implementation of that concept. I’ll be playing Arkham Knight, but I won’t be buying the season pass – and I don’t recommend that you do, either."

[Vault-tec Rep Høröúßøí]

http://batman-news.com/2015/05/02/new-batman-arkham-knight-dlc-details-play-as-batgirl-photo/



and heres my truck full of money

[HyperVoiceActing]

Something about it seems photoshopped to me. Mainly the helmet.

Also, is that suppose to be Cassandra Cain or Stephine Brown?

[Rage]

this is just shameful....they just need to up the prices of games and stop with all this false dlc and incomplete games releasing mess. give up full games, true dlc, and hell unlockables too.

[Tha Lando ( Le CROM )]

this is just shameful....they just need to up the prices of games and stop with all this false dlc and incomplete games releasing mess. give up full games, true dlc, and hell unlockables too.

i second that!